🔗 Share this article

Iturns out Ruben Amorim could survive losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important continental showpiece against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home against domestic rivals, finishing 15th, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back in Blackburn’s championship campaign, Amorim took on the executive and seems to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for losing individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his nine months of experience with the Saints, to regard him as merely a drudge within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outsmarting the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, he has demonstrated as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's competitors are now rightly wary.

The Tactical Clash Over System & Ideology

For example, it was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued by a man with the unimpeachable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, and with very good reason. The true intellectuals in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being prepared to receive.

An Supreme Authority Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt analytics and analytics. According to ESPN, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style of play “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally better. Whom else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Football Order: Executives Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with ideas and drive to go into an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they overseen? Better by far to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were once chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the food, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures two medium-sized trophies, and effectively is dismissed for talking. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him continue to make errors another day.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach only to fire them for playing excessively that system. Bring in the project manager and then bin him for requiring too long. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.