🔗 Share this article

In my role as a DM, I usually steered clear of heavy use of randomization during my Dungeons & Dragons adventures. My preference was for story direction and session development to be guided by player choice as opposed to the roll of a die. Recently, I decided to alter my method, and I'm truly glad I did.

The Inspiration: Observing an Improvised Tool

A well-known podcast utilizes a DM who often requests "luck rolls" from the players. He does this by selecting a type of die and assigning potential outcomes based on the result. It's essentially no distinct from rolling on a random table, these are created spontaneously when a player's action lacks a clear resolution.

I chose to experiment with this method at my own table, primarily because it appeared interesting and presented a break from my normal practice. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated balance between planning and spontaneity in a D&D campaign.

A Powerful In-Game Example

During one session, my players had concluded a city-wide battle. When the dust settled, a cleric character inquired after two beloved NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. Instead of picking a fate, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both would perish; on a 5-9, a single one would die; a high roll, they survived.

The die came up a 4. This resulted in a deeply poignant moment where the party discovered the bodies of their allies, still clasped together in death. The cleric conducted a ceremony, which was particularly powerful due to earlier character interactions. In a concluding touch, I decided that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly transformed, revealing a spell-storing object. By chance, the item's magical effect was precisely what the party needed to address another pressing quest obstacle. It's impossible to plan such serendipitous coincidences.

Improving DM Agility

This event made me wonder if chance and thinking on your feet are in fact the essence of tabletop RPGs. Even if you are a meticulously planning DM, your skill to pivot may atrophy. Groups reliably excel at ignoring the best constructed plans. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and invent details in real-time.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a great way to practice these abilities without straying too much outside your usual style. The strategy is to use them for low-stakes decisions that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to determine if the central plot figure is a traitor. However, I might use it to determine whether the party reach a location right after a critical event takes place.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also helps make players feel invested and cultivate the sensation that the game world is responsive, shaping according to their decisions as they play. It prevents the perception that they are merely pawns in a rigidly planned script, thereby bolstering the cooperative foundation of the game.

This philosophy has historically been part of the game's DNA. Early editions were enamored with random tables, which made sense for a playstyle focused on treasure hunting. Although current D&D often emphasizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, this isn't always the best approach.

Finding the Sweet Spot

Absolutely nothing wrong with being prepared. Yet, there is also nothing wrong with stepping back and letting the rolls to decide some things rather than you. Direction is a big factor in a DM's job. We require it to manage the world, yet we frequently find it hard to release it, in situations where doing so can lead to great moments.

My final advice is this: Do not fear of letting go of the reins. Experiment with a little chance for inconsequential outcomes. It may create that the unexpected outcome is significantly more powerful than anything you could have planned in advance.