🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be slashed by more than half, following a divisive law change that required local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Background Information on Indigenous Representation

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils could only establish a Māori ward by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations often spent years building local support and urging their councils to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change required councils that had established a electoral district under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Out of 42 local governments taking part in the public vote, 17 voted to keep their wards, and 25 to disestablish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and asserts it is committed to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

The results of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while rural regions skewed heavily towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had recently been established – they’re only just starting to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls registered the lowest voter turnout in over three decades, with under one-third of eligible voters casting a vote, prompting calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different wards – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.